Flores-Carrillo v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
| Oscar Flores-Carrillo |
| Department of Health and Human Services, Correctional Health Services and FNU LNU |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI) |
| 2:2025cv00768 |
| September 8, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Review the filing fee under the PLRA Act/Prison Litigation Reform Act. Granting #9 Motion for initial partial filing fee of $22.05. Plaintiff's initial partial filing fee is now due thirty days from the date of this Order. If it is not timely paid, this action will be dismissed without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 01/05/2026. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for initial partial filing fee be paid until after October 15, 2025 filed by Plaintiff Oscar Flores-Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Review the filing fee under the PLRA Act/Prison Litigation Reform Act filed by Plaintiff Oscar Flores-Carrillo. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 7
Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 22.05 received, receipt number 11488. (kop)
|
|
Filing 6
**SEALED DOCUMENT** FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Oscar Flores-Carrillo received from Correctional Institution. Initial Partial Filing Fee $ 22.05. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Statement, #2 FFF Initial Payment)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 5
DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepaying the Filing Fee. Based on the inmate's attached Required Authorization, Consent, and Declaration, the inmate account office is authorized and requested to: 1) within 14 days file the Financial Certificate showing the Initial Partial Filing Fee together with the inmate account statement as outlined in the attached instructions, and 2) remit the initial partial filing fee within 30 days as outlined in the attached instructions. It is ultimately Plaintiffs responsibility to ensure these items are received from the inmate account office. Failure to comply will result in case dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 09/10/2025. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff Oscar Flores-Carrillo. (kop)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Oscar Flores-Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Appointment of Counsel)(kop)
|
|
Filing 2
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M Romero for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 09/05/2025) filed by Plaintiff Oscar Flores-Carrillo. (kop)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Correctional Health Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Director of Health and Human Services, Director of Medical (Originally received by the court on 09/05/2025). (Fee Status: pending IFP) filed by Oscar Flores-Carrillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit's Grievances, #3 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball (kop) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/20/2025) (kec). (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/20/2025) (kec). (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/20/2025) (kec). (Attachment 3 replaced on 10/20/2025) (kec).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
