Pendyala v. Edlow et al
| Murali Krishna Pendyala |
| Joseph B. Edlow and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| USAO Notice Immigration Case |
| 2:2025cv00854 |
| September 26, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM THE COURT. On 10/10/2025, Plaintiff filed #4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the notice of voluntary dismissal is self-effectuating. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the terms of the notice of voluntary dismissal. No order will follow. (jcd) |
| Civil Case Terminated without prejudice per notice from the court 5 . (sg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Murali Krishna Pendyala. (sg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Murali Krishna Pendyala. (kop) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Joseph B. Edlow. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph B. Edlow, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 11555) (Fee Status: paid) filed by Murali Krishna Pendyala. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (kop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
