Verde v. Bisignano
Plaintiff: Anthony Verde
Defendant: Frank Bisignano
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2025cv00898
Filed: October 9, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2026 Filing 18 Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Review of Social Security Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Agency Action is received filed by Plaintiff Anthony Verde. (Bolli-Jones, Natalie)
March 9, 2026 Filing 17 RESPONSE to #11 MOTION for Review of Agency Action. Commissioner's response is received filed by Defendant Frank Bisignano. Under Supplemental Rule 8, Plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief by 3/23/2026. (Milano, Jessica)
February 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #15 Commissioner's Second Unopposed Motion to Amend Administrative Appeal Scheduling Order. The Commissioner's Responsive Brief is due March 9, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/23/2026. No attached document. (med)
February 23, 2026 Filing 15 Second MOTION to Amend Administrative Appeal Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support (Unopposed) filed by Defendant Frank Bisignano. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Milano, Jessica)
February 23, 2026 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Milano on behalf of Frank Bisignano (Milano, Jessica)
January 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Review of Social Security Agency Action. Defendant's response brief is due 2/23/2026. Subsequent briefing deadlines shall be as set forth in the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/14/2026. No attached document. (cpb)
January 13, 2026 Filing 12 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Review of Social Security Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Agency Action is received and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Frank Bisignano. Attorney Margaret Sobota added to party Frank Bisignano(pty:dft)(Sobota, Margaret)
December 24, 2025 Filing 11 Plaintiff's MOTION for Review of Social Security Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Agency Action is received filed by Plaintiff Anthony Verde. Under Supplemental Rule 7, Commissioners brief must be filed and served by 1/23/2026. (Bolli-Jones, Natalie)
November 26, 2025 Filing 10 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ANSWER. The Commissioner's answer to #1 Complaint is received filed by Frank Bisignano. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff Motion for Review of Agency Action must be filed and served by 12/26/2025. Under Supplemental Rule 7, Commissioner response brief must be filed and served on the plaintiff within 30 days after service of the Motion for Review of Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 8, Plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief within 14 days after service of the Commissioner brief. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - Court Transcript Index, #2 Exhibit 3 - Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 Exhibit 4 - Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Exhibit 5 - Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Exhibit 6 - Non Disability Related Development, #6 Exhibit 7 - Disability Related Development, #7 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 1 through 9), #8 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 10 through 13))(Cadman, Carra)
November 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The stay of the case is lifted. The Commissioner's answer deadline is extended to January 14, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 11/14/2025. No attached document (med)
October 28, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Carra Sheppard Cadman on behalf of Frank Bisignano (Cadman, Carra)
October 14, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE - Service in Social Security Case, re #1 Complaint filed. Consistent with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and DUCivR 7-4, the court has notified the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the District of Utah. Answer due by 12/15/2025. (sg)
October 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 10/14/2025. (sg)
October 14, 2025 Case Stayed pursuant to General Order 25-005. (sg)
October 10, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF CONSENT Under DUCivR 72-3, returned Consent Forms from all relevant parties are now filed. The Magistrate Judge is presiding by consent. (mh)
October 10, 2025 Filing 4 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Anthony Verde. (mh)
October 9, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Anthony Verde. Form due by 10/30/2025. (mh)
October 9, 2025 Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. and Memorandum in Support Case file will be forwarded to a Magistrate Judge after intake review, filed by Plaintiff Anthony Verde. (Bolli-Jones, Natalie)
October 9, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frank Bisignano with In Forma Pauperis request filed by Anthony Verde. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bolli-Jones, Natalie)
October 9, 2025 Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg added. Case number will now read 2:25-cv-00898-DAO. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (mdj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Verde v. Bisignano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Verde
Represented By: Natalie L. Bolli-Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Bisignano
Represented By: Carra Sheppard Cadman
Represented By: Margaret Sobota
Represented By: Jessica Milano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?