Sterner v. Sandy City
| Hillary Sterner |
| Sandy City |
| Sandy City |
| Hillary Sterner |
| 2:2025cv00933 |
| October 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jill N Parrish |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Amended ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Hillary Sterner filed by Sandy City. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Lease, #2 Exhibit 2. Lease Termination, #3 Exhibit 3. Damage Repair Estimate, #4 Exhibit 4. Water Overdue Invoice)(White, Heather) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand filed by Sandy City.(White, Heather) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Plaintiff's State Law Whistleblower Claim filed by Defendant Sandy City. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Demand letter, #2 Exhibit B. Declaration of Lynn Pace, #3 Exhibit C. Declaration of Wendy Downs)(White, Heather) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sandy City with Jury Demand. filed by Hillary Sterner. (Nelson, Whitney) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Defendant is to file a responsive pleading 21 days after Plaintiff files her amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/1/26 (alt)
|
| Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant Sandy City. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead. Attorney Heather S. White added to party Sandy City(pty:dft)(White, Heather) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed served on Sandy City on 01/13/2026. Acknowledgment filed by Sandy City. (White, Heather) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Civil Standing Order filed by Plaintiff Hillary Sterner (Nelson, Whitney) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/14/2025. (dle)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 11/13/2025. (lwh)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 11/10/2025. (lwh)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed to Plaintiff Hillary Sterner. (Notice generated by clerks office) Form due by 11/12/2025. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sandy City (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5590869) filed by Hillary Sterner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nelson, Whitney) |
| Judge Jill N. Parrish added. Case number will now read 2:25-CV-00933-JNP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
