Smith v. Bisignano
Plaintiff: Talmage Smith
Defendant: Frank Bisignano
Interested Party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2025cv00965
Filed: October 28, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Dustin B Pead
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner is remanded pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. Case Closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 04/16/2026. (sg)
April 16, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion to Remand to Commissioner of Social Security - this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioners decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 04/16/2026. (sg)
April 16, 2026 Filing 17 Defendant's MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Frank Bisignano. (Koebcke, Kelli)
April 10, 2026 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelli Jo Koebcke on behalf of Frank Bisignano (Koebcke, Kelli)
March 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion to Amend Administrative Appeal Scheduling Order: Commissioner's Responsive Brief due: 04/20/2026. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (if any) due: 05/04/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/11/2026. (sg)
March 11, 2026 Filing 14 MOTION to Amend Administrative Appeal Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support Enlargement of time to file Commissioner's response brief (Unopposed) filed by Defendant Frank Bisignano. (Durel, Aimee)
February 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Amend Administrative Appeal Scheduling Order: Commissioner's Responsive Brief due: 03/19/2026. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (if any) due: 04/02/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 02/09/2026. (sg)
February 9, 2026 Filing 12 MOTION to Amend Administrative Appeal Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support Enlargement of time to file Commissioner's response brief (Unopposed) filed by Defendant Frank Bisignano. (Durel, Aimee)
February 9, 2026 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Aimee Durel on behalf of Frank Bisignano (Durel, Aimee)
January 18, 2026 Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION for Review of Social Security Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Agency Action is received filed by Plaintiff Talmage Smith. Under Supplemental Rule 7, Commissioners brief must be filed and served by 2/17/2026. (Bolli-Jones, Natalie)
December 18, 2025 Filing 9 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ANSWER. The Commissioner's answer to #1 Complaint is received filed by Frank Bisignano. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff Motion for Review of Agency Action must be filed and served by 1/20/2026. Under Supplemental Rule 7, Commissioner response brief must be filed and served on the plaintiff within 30 days after service of the Motion for Review of Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 8, Plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief within 14 days after service of the Commissioner brief. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - Court Transcript Index, #2 Exhibit 3 - Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 Exhibit 4 - Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Exhibit 5 - Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Exhibit 6 - Non Disability Related Development, #6 Exhibit 7 - Disability Related Development, #7 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 1 though 28), #8 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 29 though 50), #9 Exhibit Medical Records (Volumes 51 though 53))(Cadman, Carra)
November 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCKET TEXT ORDER LIFTING STAY - The stay imposed under General Order 25-005 is lifted as of November 13, 2025, because government funding has been restored. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 11/19/2025. (alf)
November 13, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Carra Sheppard Cadman on behalf of Frank Bisignano (Cadman, Carra)
October 29, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT Under DUCivR 72-3, returned Consent Forms from all relevant parties are now filed. The Magistrate Judge is presiding by consent. by Plaintiff Talmage Smith. (alf)
October 29, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE - Service in Social Security Case, re #1 Complaint filed. Consistent with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and DUCivR 7-4, the court has notified the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the District of Utah. Answer due by 12/29/2025. (sg)
October 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/29/2025. (sg)
October 29, 2025 Case Stayed per General Order 25-005. (sg)
October 28, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Talmage Smith. Form due by 11/18/2025. (mh)
October 28, 2025 Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. and Memorandum in Support Case file will be forwarded to a Magistrate Judge after intake review, filed by Plaintiff Talmage Smith. (Bolli-Jones, Natalie)
October 28, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frank Bisignano with In Forma Pauperis request filed by Talmage Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bolli-Jones, Natalie)
October 28, 2025 Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead added. Case number will now read 2:25-cv-00965-DBP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (mdj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Bisignano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Talmage Smith
Represented By: Natalie L. Bolli-Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Bisignano
Represented By: Carra Sheppard Cadman
Represented By: Kelli Jo Koebcke
Represented By: Aimee Durel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?