Barnett v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers
Plaintiff: Connie Barnett
Defendant: Smith's Food & Drug Centers and Kroger West
Case Number: 2:2025cv00975
Filed: October 30, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Howard C Nielson
Referring Judge: Daphne A Oberg
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2026 Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by John Bradford DeBry on behalf of Connie Barnett (DeBry, John)
March 8, 2026 Filing 24 RESPONSE to Discovery Request filed by Plaintiff Connie Barnett.(DeBry, John)
February 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 23 DOCKET TEXT ORDER striking #22 Certificate of Service of Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures. Per DUCivR 26-1(a)(1)(E), certificates of service of initial disclosures and discovery responses must not be filed on the docket. Initial disclosures, discovery requests and responses, and certificates of service of the same should only be served on opposing counsel, not filed with the court. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to review and comply with DUCivR 26-1 going forward. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/3/2026. No attached document (med)
February 2, 2026 Filing 22 STRICKEN per 23 Docket Text Order RESPONSE to Discovery Request from Smith's Food & Drug Centers filed by Plaintiff Connie Barnett.(DeBry, John) Modified on 2/3/2026 by striking docket entry (dle).
February 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 21 DOCKET TEXT ORDER striking and sealing 19 Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures; 20 Plaintiff's Discovery Responses. Per DUCivR 26-1(a)(1), initial disclosures and discovery responses must not be filed on the docket unless the court orders otherwise. Therefore, these documents are stricken. These documents shall also be sealed, where they contain medical records and unredacted personal identifiers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/2/2026. No attached document (med)
January 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 DISCOVERY MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/12/2026. (dle)
January 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #15 Stipulated Motion for Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/12/2026. (dle)
January 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: Defendant has not filed a copy of (1) the state court docket sheet or (2) its answer filed in state court, as required under DUCivR 81-1(b) (requiring attachment of the state court record to the notice of removal). Defendants shall file the state court docket sheet and answer on the federal docket within fourteen days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/12/2026. No attached document (med)
January 9, 2026 Filing 15 Stipulated MOTION for Scheduling Order filed by Defendant Smith's Food & Drug Centers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attorney Planning Meeting Report, #2 Text of Proposed Order Scheduling Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Edwards, Stephen)
January 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 DOCKET TEXT ORDER denying without prejudice #13 Stipulated Motion for Scheduling Order. The parties did not use the court's current forms for their attorney planning meeting report and proposed scheduling order. Within fourteen days, the parties must refile their motion using the current forms, available on the court's website at https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-scheduling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/8/2026. No attached document. (med)
January 7, 2026 Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Scheduling Order filed by Defendant Smith's Food & Drug Centers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attorneys' Planning Meeting Report, #2 Text of Proposed Order Scheduling Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Edwards, Stephen)
January 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The parties are ordered to comply with DUCivR 81-1(d)(3) within fourteen days, including submitting an attorney planning meeting report, proposed scheduling order, and the appropriate motion (stipulated motion for scheduling order or motion for scheduling conference). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/6/2026. No attached document (med)
November 24, 2025 Filing 11 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 250907539, against Connie Barnett. filed by Smith's Food & Drug Centers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Domestic Articles, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Edwards, Stephen)
November 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DOCKET TEXT ORDER Defendant removed this case from Utah state court, invoking this court's diversity jurisdiction. In the notice of removal, Defendant represents that "[a]cording to Plaintiff's Complaint, Plaintiff is, and was at the time she commenced this action, domiciled in and a resident of the State of Utah." Dkt. No. 2 at 6. But in the complaint, Plaintiff alleges only that, "[a]t all relevant times," she "was a resident of Salt Lake City, Utah." Dkt. No. 2-1 at 1. It is well settled that, for individuals who are United States citizens, diversity jurisdiction turns on state citizenship, not mere residence; that state citizenship turns on domicile; and that domicile is not the same thing as residence. See, e.g., Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield , 490 U.S. 30, 48 (1989); Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Sur. Co., 781 F.3d 1233, 1238 (10th Cir. 2015); Smith v. Cummings, 445 F.3d 1254, 125960 (10th Cir. 2006); Whitelock v. Leatherman, 460 F.2d 507, 514 (10th Cir. 1972). (For a non-U.S. citizen, the court instead looks to the actual country of citizenship.) No later than November 24, 2025, Defendant shall file an amended notice of removal that correctly alleges Ms. Gillespie's citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1653. If the amended notice of removal fails adequately to allege subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr., on 11/10/2025. (jad) Modified on 11/19/2025 by correcting deadline date (dle).
November 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 11/4/25 (alt)
November 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 5/12/2025. (ks)
November 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 11/3/25. (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
October 30, 2025 Filing 6 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Defendant Kroger West/Smith's. (mh)
October 30, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE OF INELIGIBLE ATTORNEY - Attorney Tara Mosley, for Plaintiff Connie Barnett, has been notified that she is not in active status or has not been admitted to practice in this court and cannot practice before this court. (mdj)
October 30, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed to Plaintiff Connie Barnett, Defendant Kroger West/Smith's. (mdj)
October 30, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not E-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed to Plaintiff Connie Barnett, Defendant Kroger West/Smith's. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 11/20/2025. (mdj)
October 30, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 250907539, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5601193) filed by Kroger West/Smith's. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Domestic Articles, #4 Exhibit D - Declaration, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Edwards, Stephen)
October 30, 2025 Filing 1 Case has been indexed. Defendant Kroger West/Smith's is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction and a judge will not be assigned until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mdj)
October 30, 2025 Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. added. Case number will now read 2:25-cv-00975-HCN. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (mdj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnett v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Barnett
Represented By: John Bradford DeBry
Represented By: Tara S Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith's Food & Drug Centers
Represented By: Stephen F. Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger West
Represented By: Stephen F. Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?