SanMedica International et al v. Ghattas
| SanMedica International, SanMedica IP Holdings and Basic Research |
| Martin Ghattas |
| Izak Rock |
| 2:2025cv01060 |
| November 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting #13 Motion to Compel. Mr. Rock is ordered to produce documents as requested in the subpoena by April 27, 2026, or a date mutually agreed to by Mr. Rock and the plaintiffs. Mr. Rocks production must be in accordance with Rule 45s requirements. The plaintiffs request for attorneys fees is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/30/2026. (alf)
|
Filing 24
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting Non-party Izak Rock's #20 Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply to Plaintiffs' #19 Reply in Support of Motion to Compel. No party has opposed the motion. Where Mr. Rock includes the sur-reply within his motion (Doc. No. 20 at 3-9), the sur-reply need not be refiled. The court construes Document number #20 as Mr. Rock's sur-reply to Plaintiffs' #19 Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/25/2026. No attached document. (cpb)
|
Filing 23
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #22 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to 5/29/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 2/6/2026. No attached document. (cpb)
|
Filing 22
Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant Martin Ghattas. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(Houck, Kara)
|
Filing 21
Supplemental AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION of Ronald F. Price in Support re #13 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Nonparty Compliance With Subpoena Duces Tecum and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings, SanMedica International. (Price, Ronald)
|
Filing 20
MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply re #19 Reply to Response to Motion to Compel #13 filed by Movant Izak Rock. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg.(alf)
|
Filing 19
REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Nonparty Compliance With Subpoena Duces Tecum and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings, SanMedica International. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum)(Price, Ronald)
|
Filing 18
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #13 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Nonparty Compliance With Subpoena Duces Tecum and Memorandum in Support filed by Movant Izak Rock. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(alf)
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Izak Rock. (alf)
|
Filing 16
Entry Error ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/14/2026. (alf) Modified on 1/23/2026 by striking entry. Order was entered twice by mistake. (lam).
|
Filing 15
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 1/15/2025. (alf)
|
Filing 14
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. #13 Motion referred to Daphne A. Oberg. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 1/12/26. (jm)
|
Filing 13
Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Nonparty Compliance With Subpoena Duces Tecum and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings, SanMedica International. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Ronald F. Price, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Steven Garff)(Price, Ronald)
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Kara M. Houck on behalf of Martin Ghattas (Houck, Kara)
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiffs Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings, SanMedica International, Defendant Martin Ghattas. (alf)
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Complaint. Answer deadline updated for Martin Ghattas to 2/27/2026. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 12/8/2025. (alf)
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Austin Bybee on behalf of Martin Ghattas (Bybee, Austin)
|
Filing 8
Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Martin Ghattas. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ahlstrom, James)
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by James L. Ahlstrom on behalf of Martin Ghattas (Ahlstrom, James)
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed. Filed by SanMedica International, Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings. Summons as to Martin Ghattas. (Price, Ronald)
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued Electronically as to Martin Ghattas. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mdj)
|
Filing 4
Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mdj)
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not E-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed to Plaintiffs Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings, SanMedica International. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 12/11/2025. (mdj)
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Martin Ghattas (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5622321) filed by SanMedica International, Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (Price, Ronald)
|
Filing 1
Case has been indexed. Plaintiffs Basic Research, SanMedica IP Holdings, SanMedica International is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction and a judge will not be assigned until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to [email protected] for issuance. (mdj)
|
Judge David Barlow added. Case number will now read 2:25-cv-01060-DBB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (mdj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.