Wang v. Dumont
| Haoyu Wang |
| Matthew Dumont, Anthony Peterson, Xiao Rong and FNU Wilcox |
| Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2026cv00141 |
| February 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MOTION for Service of Process (Prisoner). Summons to be served on: Matthew Dumont, Anthony Peterson, Xiao Rong, and FNU Wilcox filed by Plaintiff Haoyu Wang. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED MOTION to Appoint Counsel re #7 Motion to Appont Counsel filed by Plaintiff Haoyu Wang. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 9
Modification of Docket: Error: Clerk forgot to add envelope to documents scanned into case. Correction: Clerk added envelope to document as attachment. re #8 Lodged Document. (kop)
|
|
Filing 8
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Summonses. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (kop) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/24/2026: #1 Envelope ) (kop).
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Haoyu Wang. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 6
Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 35.27 received, receipt number 13327. (kop)
|
|
Filing 5
**SEALED DOCUMENT** FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Haoyu Wang received from Correctional Institution. Initial Partial Filing Fee $ 35.27. (Attachments: #1 Accounting Transactions and Balances)(kpf) Modified on 3/27/2026 (kec).
|
|
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. (ks)
|
|
Filing 4
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepaying the Filing Fee. Based on the inmate's attached Required Authorization, Consent, and Declaration, the inmate account office is authorized and requested to: 1) within 14 days file the Financial Certificate showing the Initial Partial Filing Fee together with the inmate account statement as outlined in the attached instructions, and 2) remit the initial partial filing fee within 30 days as outlined in the attached instructions. It is ultimately Plaintiffs responsibility to ensure these items are received from the inmate account office. Failure to comply will result in case dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 02/20/2026. (kpf)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate Judge to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 2/20/2026. (ks)
|
|
Filing 2
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Case file forwarded to the Prisoner Litigation Unit. (Received by the court on: 2/18/2026) filed by Plaintiff Haoyu Wang. (kop)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Matthew Dumont, Anthony Peterson, Xiao Rong, FNU Wilcox (Originally received by the court on 2/18/2026). (Fee Status: pending IFP) filed by Haoyu Wang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. (kop) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/19/2026: #7 Envelope ) (kop).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
