Johnson v. Bisignano
| Scott Johnson |
| Frank Bisignano |
| Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2026cv00213 |
| March 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ANSWER. The Commissioner's answer to #1 Complaint is received filed by Frank Bisignano. Under Supplemental Rule 6, Plaintiff Motion for Review of Agency Action must be filed and served by 5/22/2026. Under Supplemental Rule 7, Commissioner response brief must be filed and served on the plaintiff within 30 days after service of the Motion for Review of Agency Action. Under Supplemental Rule 8, Plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief within 14 days after service of the Commissioner brief. (Cadman, Carra) |
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr on 5/11/2025. (ks)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-3 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr and Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Carra Sheppard Cadman on behalf of Frank Bisignano (Cadman, Carra) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE - Service in Social Security Case, re #1 Complaint filed. Consistent with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and DUCivR 7-4, the court has notified the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the District of Utah. Answer due by 5/12/2026. (sg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 03/13/2026. (sg)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Scott Johnson. Form due by 4/2/2026. (mh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan Konoski on behalf of Scott Johnson (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. filed by Plaintiff Scott Johnson. (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frank Bisignano with In Forma Pauperis request filed by Scott Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Konoski, Bryan) |
| Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00213-JCB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
