Barney Randall v. Enslow et al
| Jeremy Bryan Barney Randall Enslow |
| John Enslow, Jonathan Michael Barney and Sue Enslow |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 2:2026cv00287 |
| April 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Nuffer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE COURT re #1 Complaint. Attorney selected the incorrect division when creating the case. Case 2:26-cv-00287-DN will be closed and all pleadings will be transferred to a new case number. Case number will now read 4:26-cv-00038-DN. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg) |
| Filing 3 Case Reassigned to Judge David Nuffer. Judge Jill N. Parrish no longer assigned to the case. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00287-DN. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (sg) |
| Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Case file forwarded to the Prisoner Litigation Unit. (Received by the court on: 04/06/2026) filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Byron Barney Randall. (bg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jonathan Michael Barney, John Enslow, Sue Enslow (Originally received by the court on 04/06/2026). (Fee Status: IFP Pending) filed by Jeremy Byron Barney Randall. (Attachments: #1 Envelope ) Assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish (bg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
