Hackford v. United States Department of the Interior et al
| Richita Marie Hackford |
| United States Department of the Interior, Secretary of the Interior and Doug Burgum |
| 2:2026cv00347 |
| April 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Real Property: Other |
| 25 U.S.C. ยง 0640 Indian Tribal Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-3 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge David Barlow and Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(mh) |
| Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Richita Marie Hackford. (mh) |
Filing 5
ORDER temporarily granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court will screen Plaintiffs complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and DUCivR 3-2(b). The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. If this case is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on Defendant(s). Other than court forms (e.g., the email filing and electronic notification form for unrepresented parties and the consent to jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge form), Plaintiff must not file any other documents during the time the complaint is screened or until the court orders otherwise. If Plaintiff files any such other documents, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until screening of the complaint is completed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 04/27/2026. (sg)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Richita Marie Hackford. Form due by 5/18/2026. (mh) |
| Filing 3 Modification of Docket: Error: Clerk forgot to add Certificate of Mailing to Initial Complaint when filing. Correction: Clerk added the Certificate of Service as an attachment to the Complaint. (kop) |
| Filing 2 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Received by the court on: 4/24/2026) filed by Plaintiff Richita Marie Hackford. (Attachments: #1 Notice from Social Security Administration, #2 Proposed order on IFP).(kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Doug Burgum, Secretary of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior (Originally received by the court on 4/24/2026). (Fee Status: pending IFP) filed by Richita Marie Hackford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kop) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/24/2026: #2 Exhibit Certificate of Mailing) (kop). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
