Bullock v. Express Recovery Services, Inc. et al
| Patty Bullock |
| Express Recovery Services, Inc. and Primus Law PC |
| 2:2026cv00477 |
| May 25, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 05/27/2026. (sg)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Primus Law PC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (sg) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Express Recovery Services, Inc.. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (sg) |
| Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00477-DBP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (sg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5797736) filed by Patty Bullock. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Stephenson, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
