DISH Technologies LLC et al v. MW Media SC
| DISH Technologies LLC and Sling TV LLC |
| MW Media SC a Polish civil law partnership doing business as EPorner.com |
| 2:2026cv00508 |
| June 1, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Ann Marie McIff Allen |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice mailed to attorney Kurt Pankratz, Ali Dhanani, and Jamie R. Lynn for DISH Technologies LLC, Sling TV LLC (bg) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (bg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam M. Pace on behalf of DISH Technologies LLC, Sling TV LLC (Pace, Adam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MW Media SC (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5805829) filed by DISH Technologies LLC, Sling TV LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hatch, Brent) |
| District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00508-AMA. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (bg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
