Butterfield v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Vianca I Butterfield |
| U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Joseph B Edlow |
| 2:2026cv00519 |
| June 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: On July 21, 2026, Plaintiff filed #8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the dismissal is self-effectuating. Pursuant to the terms of the notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed without prejudice, with each party bearing its own fees and costs. No order will follow. (med) |
| Filing 10 Modification of Docket: Error: Joint motion filed in incorrect case. Correction: motion stricken and terminated re #9 Joint MOTION to Dismiss, parties to disregard. (nl) |
| Filing 9 STRICKEN - PARTIES TO DISREGARD Joint MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Vianca I Butterfield. (Bracken, Alec) Modified on 7/22/2026 counsel filed motion in incorrect case, stricken parties to disregard, this motion has been terminated. (nl). |
| Civil Case Terminated per ECF 11 . Case closed. (sg) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Vianca I Butterfield (Bracken, Alec) |
Filing 7
DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #6 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to August 17, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 7/17/2026. No attached document. (med)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendants Joseph B Edlow, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order) Attorney Tyler L. Murray added to party Joseph B Edlow(pty:dft), Attorney Tyler L. Murray added to party U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft)(Murray, Tyler) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued Electronically as to U.S. Department of Justice, Washington D.C. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (kop) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to USDOJ SLC. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (kop) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (kop) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Joseph B Edlow. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph B Edlow, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5809038) filed by Vianca I Butterfield. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Bracken, Alec) |
| Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00519-DAO. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (bg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
