Melton v. McKinnon et al
| Joni Lee Melton |
| Shawn Eric McKinnon, Andrew McKeon and Taylorsville City |
| 2:2026cv00548 |
| June 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE RE: ATTORNEY'S STATUS. Attorney Scott R. Edgar has appeared under DUCivR 83-1.3, on behalf of Plaintiff Joni Lee Melton, but is not currently admitted to practice in this court as required by DUCivR 83-1.1. Current admission status is Registration Lapsed. Please review the attorney admission #instructions or the attorney registration #instructions to address the issue. After the court's #Attorney Directory reflects a status of active, pro hac vice, or federal, the attorney may practice before this court and will need to file an appearance to be added to the case.The Notice of Electronic Filing for this notice will be sent to the attorney at [email protected]. (kop) |
| Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00548-DBP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5820553) filed by Joni Lee Melton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Melton, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.