Mikayelyan v. Instructure, Inc.
| Tigran Mikayelyan |
| Instructure Inc |
| 2:2026cv00566 |
| June 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 THIS CASE HAS BEEN CLOSED pursuant to ECF 5 order of consolidation. All docketing will be in the lead case 2:26-cv-00374-RJS-CMR. NO FURTHER DOCKETING ON THIS CASE. (mh) |
Filing 5
DOCKET TEXT ORDER- This case involves a data breach of Instructure Inc.'s network. Other matters related to this data breach have been consolidated into In Re Instructure Data Breach Litigation, 2:26-cv-00374-RJS-CMR. Local Rule 42-1(c) authorizes the court to enter an order of consolidation without a motion. For the reasons explained in In Re Instructure Data Breach Litigation, 2:26-cv-00374-RJS-CMR, Dkt. 41, Order to Consolidate, the court orders this case be consolidated. Any objections to consolidation must be filed within seven days. If no objection is filed, this case will be consolidated into In Re Instructure Data Breach Litigation, 2:26-cv-00374-RJS-CMR. No attached document. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 6/23/2026. (mh)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice emailed to attorneys Tina Wolfson, and Jeff Westerman for Tigran Mikayelyan. (kop) |
| Filing 3 CASE STAYED pursuant to General Order 26-007 until the court orders otherwise. (kop) |
| Filing 2 Case Reassigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby per order in case 2:26-cv-00374-RJS-CMR. District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen no longer assigned to the case. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00566-RJS. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kop) |
| Modification of Docket. Error: Dft name was added incorrectly at case opening. Correction: Dft's name been corrected in CM/ECF data to conform more closely with this court's "Standards and Guidelines for Adding Parties", available on the court's website (punctuation removed from name). Filer is reminded to use care when opening cases/adding parties. (alt) |
| District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00566-AMA. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Instructure, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5827198) filed by Tigran Mikayelyan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Steele, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mikayelyan v. Instructure, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tigran Mikayelyan | |
| Represented By: | Daniel L. Steele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Instructure Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
