Unforgettable Coatings of Utah v. BASF Coatings et al
| Unforgettable Coatings of Utah |
| QXO, BASF Coatings, BASF Corporation, Sika Corporation, Smalley & Company and Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc |
| 2:2026cv00673 |
| July 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer deadline updated for QXO answer due 9/16/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/9/2026. (kop)
|
| Filing 14 EXHIBITS filed by QXO re #13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . (Velardo, Vincent) |
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant QXO. Attorney Vincent J. Velardo added to party QXO(pty:dft)(Velardo, Vincent) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Logan Daniel Biesinger on behalf of Unforgettable Coatings of Utah (Biesinger, Logan) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Matthew D. Jacobson for BASF Coatings.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions#PHV. A Pro Hac Vice Attorney who fails to register for CM/ECF access will not receive notifications of electronic filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 8/26/2026. (kop)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Matthew D. Jacobson , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-5896636,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant BASF Coatings. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Matthew D. Jacobson, #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Order for Pro Hac Vice Admission for Matthew D. Jacobson)(Hill, Rebecca) |
| Filing 9 Amended ANSWER to Complaint filed by BASF Corporation, Sika Corporation.(Hallock, Blake) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #1 ) with Jury Demand filed by BASF Coatings. Attorney Rebecca L. Hill added to party BASF Coatings(pty:dft)(Hill, Rebecca) |
| Filing 7 Defendants Sika Corporation and BASF Corporation's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand filed by BASF Corporation, Sika Corporation.(Hallock, Blake) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING of District Court Docket Report re #1 Notice of Removal, 3 Notice of Deficiency, filed by Defendants BASF Corporation, Sika Corporation. (Hallock, Blake) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 7/20/2026. (kop)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE RE: ATTORNEY'S STATUS. Attorney Matthew D. Jacobson has appeared under DUCivR 83-1.3, on behalf of Defendant BASF Coatings, but is not currently admitted to practice in this court as required by DUCivR 83-1.1. Current admission status is Not Admitted. Please review the attorney admission #instructions or the attorney registration #instructions to address the issue. After the court's #Attorney Directory reflects a status of active, pro hac vice, or federal, the attorney may practice before this court and will need to file an appearance to be added to the case.The Notice of Electronic Filing for this notice will be sent to the attorney at [email protected]. (bg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY No state court records were filed with the Notice of Removal. See 28 U.S.C. 1446(a). You must immediately file all process, pleadings, and orders served on you in the state court action as an Exhibit in Support of the Notice of Removal. (bg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE RE: ATTORNEY'S STATUS. Attorney Logan D. Biesinger has appeared under DUCivR 83-1.3, on behalf of Plaintiff Unforgettable Coatings of Utah, but is not currently admitted to practice in this court as required by DUCivR 83-1.1. Current admission status is Not Admitted. Please review the attorney admission #instructions or the attorney registration #instructions to address the issue. After the court's #Attorney Directory reflects a status of active, pro hac vice, or federal, the attorney may practice before this court and will need to file an appearance to be added to the case.The Notice of Electronic Filing for this notice will be sent to the attorney at [email protected]. (bg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 3rd District Court Salt Lake County, case number 260904349, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5856339) filed by Sika Corporation, BASF Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Hallock, Blake) |
| Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00673-DBP. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (bg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.