Martinez v. Instructure, Inc.
| Raymond Martinez |
| Instructure Inc |
| 2:2026cv00738 |
| August 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice emailed to attorney Bethany C. Lobo for Instructure Inc. (kec) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice emailed to attorney Isabel Rose Mansanque, James Michael Treglio, Mark D. Potter, and Naomi Marie Butler for Raymond Martinez. (kec) |
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from USDC of California Southern; Case Number 3:26-cv-04419. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Shelby to case 2:26-cv-00738-RJS. |
| Filing 6 Case transferred to District of Utah District Court. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Utah District Court*.*351 S West Temple, Room 1.100**Salt Lake City, UT 84101*. Signed by District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/6/2026. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rxc) [Transferred from California Southern on 8/10/2026.] |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Change Venue to the District of Utah by Instructure, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lobo, Bethany) (rxc). [Transferred from California Southern on 8/10/2026.] |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Instructure, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Instructure Holdings, LLC, Corporate Parent Icon Parent I, Inc., Other Affiliate Dragoneer, Other Affiliate KKR for Instructure, Inc... (Lobo, Bethany)(rxc). [Transferred from California Southern on 8/10/2026.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Instructure, Inc. . No Parties With Financial Interest. (Lobo, Bethany) (axc1). [Transferred from California Southern on 8/10/2026.] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Bethany C. Lobo on behalf of Instructure, Inc. (Lobo, Bethany)(axc1). [Transferred from California Southern on 8/10/2026.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-21459943.), filed by Instructure, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Bethany C. Lobo, #3 A, #4 B, #5 C, #6 D, #7 E)The new case number is 3:26-cv-4419-DMS-MSB. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(wxa) [Transferred from California Southern on 8/10/2026.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Instructure, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond Martinez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Instructure Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
