Stevens v. American Express Company et al
| Mikaela Stevens |
| Fortiva Retail Credit, American Express Company, Bank of America, Capital One Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Discover Bank, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Klarna Bank, Mountain America Federal Credit Union, Bank of Missouri, Sofi Bank, Synchrony Bank, Republic Bank & Trust Company and Cyprus Federal Credit Union |
| 2:2026cv00753 |
| August 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/17/2026. (bg)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Mikaela Stevens. (faf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Express Company, Bank of America, Capital One Bank, Cyprus Federal Credit Union, Discover Bank, Fortiva Retail Credit, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Klarna Bank, Mountain America Federal Credit Union, Republic Bank & Trust Company, Sofi Bank, Synchrony Bank (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 14994) (Fee Status: Paid) filed by Mikaela Stevens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (faf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.