Brown-Johnson v. Instructure Inc
| Sharlene Brown-Johnson |
| Instructure Inc |
| 2:2026cv00783 |
| August 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Instructure Inc. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (faf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Sharlene Brown-Johnson. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 9/14/2026. (faf) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Rebecca Houlding , Registration fee $ 50, receipt number AUTDC-5893136,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Sharlene Brown-Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Application for Houlding PHV, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting PHV)(Harstad, Kathryn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5893127) filed by Sharlene Brown-Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Harstad, Kathryn) |
| Judge Robert J. Shelby added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00783-RJS. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (faf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown-Johnson v. Instructure Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sharlene Brown-Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn K. Harstad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Instructure Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
