Olsen v. Federal Express Corporation
Plaintiff: Nathan Olsen
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation successor by merger to; Inc. formerly doing business as Fedex Ground Package System and Fedex Ground Package System
Case Number: 2:2026cv00980
Filed: October 7, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: David Barlow
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2026 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance Pro Hac Vice emailed to attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan for Nathan Olsen. (faf)
October 8, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Nathan Olsen. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 10/29/2026. (faf)
October 8, 2026 Filing 3 Modification of Docket: Error: Second complaint for different Plaintiff name filed in error. Correction: Dkt No. 2 has been stricken from record. Refund request instructions have been email to Counsel. re #2 Complaint. (faf)
October 8, 2026 Judge David Barlow added. Case number will now read 2:26-cv-00980-DBB. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (faf)
October 7, 2026 Filing 2 STRICKEN COMPLAINT against Federal Express Corporation (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5943336) filed by Nathan Olsen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thorne, Jonathan) Modified by striking text on 10/8/2026. Second complaint filed on case in error. (faf).
October 7, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Express Corporation (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5943328) filed by Nathan Olsen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Thorne, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olsen v. Federal Express Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation successor by merger to; Inc. formerly doing business as Fedex Ground Package System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fedex Ground Package System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Olsen
Represented By: Jonathan K. Thorne
Represented By: Lauren I. Scholnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?