Glasscock v. State of Utah
Petitioner: David Glasscock
Respondent: State of Utah
Case Number: 4:2018cv00004
Filed: March 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Southern Region Office
County: Sanpete
Presiding Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER: Denying 3 Habeas-Corpus Petition. It is therefore ordered that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is Denied and the action is Dismissed with prejudice. It is also ordered that a certificate of appealability is Denied. This action is closed. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 03/25/2021. (kpf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glasscock v. State of Utah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Glasscock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Utah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?