Ruesch et al v. Purple Shovel et al
| Don L. Ruesch and Loneva R. Ruesch |
| Purple Shovel, Strong & Hanni, Michael L. Ford, Steptoe and Johnson, Statewide Court and Attorney Services and Edward Houghtalen |
| 4:2018cv00028 |
| May 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Southern Region Office |
| Washington |
| David Nuffer |
| Dustin B. Pead |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERgranting 129 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Worrell/Bates Defendants' Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against the Worrell/Bates Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 3/30/21. (jwt)
|
|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER (1) denying 125 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Strong & Hanni, P.C., Michael L. Ford and Steptoe & Johnson, LLP and (2) Granting 126 Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP's, Strong & Hanni, P.C.'s, and Michael L. Ford's Joint Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 3/29/21. (dla)
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 72 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment AND granting 77 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Ruesches FDCPA claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/24/2019. (jds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
