Wells Fargo Bank National Association v. Trex Services et al
| Wells Fargo Bank National Association |
| Trex Services and Steven R. Montgomery |
| 4:2019cv00008 |
| January 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Nuffer |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wells Fargo Bank National Association as to Steven R. Montgomery served on 2/25/2019, answer due 3/18/2019. (Olsen, Sherilyn) |
| Filing 9 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Steven R. Montgomery. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Trex Services. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (tlh) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST) against Steven R. Montgomery, Trex Services. filed by Wells Fargo Bank National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note, #2 Exhibit B - Guaranty) (Olsen, Sherilyn) |
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. So ordered by Judge David Nuffer on 1/17/19 (docket text only - no attached document)(alt)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: by no later than 1/24/19, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint containing allegations essential to show the citizenship of parties. Failure to do so will result in this action being dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/17/19 (alt)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/17/19 (alt)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE FROM THE COURT This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (asb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Steven R. Montgomery, Trex Services (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-3184490) filed by Wells Fargo Bank National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note, #2 Exhibit B - Guaranty, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Olsen, Sherilyn) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank National Association is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
