Hamilton v. Nelson
Tony Alexander Hamilton |
Shane Nelson |
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit |
4:2020cv00053 |
June 4, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
David Nuffer |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Petitioner Tony Alexander Hamilton (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (alt) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Petitioner Tony Alexander Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf) |
Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State, under 28 U.S.C. 2241 Fee Status: IFP. (Originally received on 06/04/2020) filed by Tony Alexander Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Memorandum in Support of Petition, #4 Affidavit 1, #5 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (jl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/8/2020: #6 rescanned for ocr) (jl). |
![]() |
Filing 2 *** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Tony Alexander Hamilton received from Correctional Institution (kn) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. and Memorandum in Support Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 06/04/2020) filed by Petitioner Tony Alexander Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum, #2 Exhibit Affidavit)(kn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.