Lynch v. Reyes
Sherman Alexander Lynch |
Sean D. Reyes |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
4:2020cv00093 |
August 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
David Nuffer |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Sherman Alexander Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf) |
Filing 7 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction against Defendant's re[presentation by the office of the Utah Attorney General filed by Plaintiff Sherman Alexander Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf) |
Filing 6 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #5 MOTION Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Sherman Alexander Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Sherman Alexander Lynch. (dw) |
Filing 4 *** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Sherman Alexander Lynch received from Correctional Institution. Exhibit to #3 Motion for Appointed Counsel. (dw) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Sherman Alexander Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Impecuniosity)(dw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/1/2020: #2 rescanned for ocr) (jl). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Sherman Alexander Lynch. (dw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sean D. Reyes (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4681091469) filed by Sherman Alexander Lynch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Second Motion for Summary Judgment, Case No. 110913691, #2 Exhibit B - State District Court's January 6, 2014 Memorandum Decision, #3 Exhibit C - Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, Case No. 150900245, #4 Exhibit D - Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgement, Case No. 150900286, #5 Exhibit E - State District Court's March 28, 2016 Ruling and Order, Case No. 150900245, #6 Exhibit F - State District Court's March 25, 2016 Ruling and Order, Case No. 150900286, #7 Exhibit G - Lynch's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Case No. 2:17-CV-00477-DS, #8 Exhibit H1 - Lynch's Exhibits Supporting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #9 Exhibit H2 - Lynch's Exhibits Supporting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #10 Exhibit H3 - Lynch's Exhibits Supporting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #11 Exhibit H4 - Lynch's Exhibits Supporting Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #12 Exhibit I - Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #13 Exhibit J - Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpos, #14 Exhibit K -U.S. District Court's Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Habeas Corpus Petition, #15 Exhibit L - Lynch's Motion for Relief from Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition Under Rule 60(b )(3), #16 Exhibit M - Defendant's Response to Petitioner's Request to Submit Post-Judgement Motion for Decision, #17 Exhibit N - U.S. District Court's Order Denying Post-Judgment Motions, #18 Exhibit O - Lynch's Informal Complaint Against Sean D. Reyes to the OPC, #19 Exhibit P - Mr. Reyes' Letter to the OPC Responding to Informal Complaint, #20 Exhibit Q - Mr. Boyer's Letter to the OPC Responding to Informal Complaint, #21 Exhibit R - OPC's Dismissal of Informal Complaint, #22 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (dw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/31/2020: #24 rescanned for OCR, #25 rescanned for OCR) (jl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.