Tapasa v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals et al
| Solomona Tapasa |
| GlaxoSmithKline, Chattem, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi US Services |
| 4:2021cv00039 |
| April 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Paul Kohler |
| David Nuffer |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 4/9/21 (alt)
|
|
Filing 9
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 4/9/2021. (pjd)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE FROM THE COURT This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (pjd) |
| Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Sanofi US Services. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to GlaxoSmithKline. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Pfizer. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Chattem. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3974788) filed by Solomona Tapasa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (North, Kara) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiff Solomona Tapasa is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
