Knight v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
| Mary Knight |
| The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company |
| 4:2021cv00091 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Paul Kohler |
| David Nuffer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 10/28/21 (alt)
|
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time Response to Complaint and Scheduling Order filed by Defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company. Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Lancaster, Aaron) Modified on 10/28/2021: removed incorrectly added text (alt) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Prepare Schedule per #5 Order; granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #2 Notice of Removal: Answer deadline updated for Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company - answer due 10/29/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 9/14/21 (alt)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Prepare Schedule/Case Management Conference, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Notice of Removal filed by Defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company. Motions referred to Paul Kohler. (Lancaster, Aaron) Modified on 9/16/2021: removed incorrectly added entry text and added link to Ntc of Removal entry (alt) |
|
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 8/31/2021. (pjd)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 8/31/21 (alt)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE COURT This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (pjd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 5th District Court Iron County, case number 21050092. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AUTDC-4096371) filed by Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #2 Exhibit Complaint) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Modified on 9/15/2021 Error in original filings with answer records, refiled by the docket clerk and docket number corrected to #2 . (nl) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 5th District Court Iron County, case number 210500092, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4096371) filed by The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Complaint) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Lancaster, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Defendant The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
