Wall v. Blood
Johnny Brickman Wall |
Devin Blood |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
4:2021cv00103 |
October 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
David Nuffer |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 EXHIBITS filed by Johnny Brickman Wall re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254. (Parnes, Andrew) |
|
Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Andrew Parnes , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4134939,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Petitioner Johnny Brickman Wall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Shapiro, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Andrew Parnes, for Petitioner Johnny Brickman Wall (nmt) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 4681096169). (Originally received on 10/08/2021) filed by Johnny Brickman Wall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.