Crowe et al v. SRR Partners et al
| Leanne Crowe and Levi Crowe |
| SRR Partners doing business as Sorrel River Ranch Resort & Spa, JJ's Mercantile and Elizabeth Rad |
| 4:2021cv00108 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Paul Kohler |
| David Nuffer |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
DOCKET TEXT ORDER taking under advisement #12 Motion to Dismiss; taking under advisement #13 Motion for Extension of Time.Defendants SRR Partners and JJ's Mercantile ("SRR and JJ") filed the #12 Motion to Dismiss after the deadline to answer the #2 Complaint had expired. Defendants also filed a #13 Motion for Extension of Time to file their answer. Plaintiffs must file any response to the #13 Motion for Extension of Time on or before Tuesday, January 4, 2022. Any reply shall be filed on or before Friday, January 7, 2022. Plaintiffs must file any opposition to the #12 Motion to Dismiss on or before Thursday, January 13, 2022. SRR and JJ must file any reply on or before Friday January 21, 2022 at 2 pm.Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 12/29/2021. No attached document. (anf)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint and Assert Counterclaims and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants JJ's Mercantile, SRR Partners. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Extend Time to Answer Complaint and Assert Counterclaims) Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Benard, Bryan)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action filed by Defendants JJ's Mercantile, SRR Partners. Attorney Bryan K. Benard added to party JJ's Mercantile(pty:dft), Attorney Bryan K. Benard added to party SRR Partners(pty:dft)(Benard, Bryan)
|
|
Filing 11
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leanne Crowe, Levi Crowe as to Elizabeth Rad served on 12/21/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. (Anderson-West, Michele)
|
|
ANSWER DEADLINE UPDATED for JJ's Mercantile answer due 12/14/2021; SRR Partners answer due 12/14/2021. (alf)
|
|
Filing 10
Modification of Docket re #9 Summons Returned Executed, #8 Summons Returned Executed: Error: The documents filed indicate that summons was served on 11/23/21 not 11/22/21 as filed. Correction: SRR and JJ's to 12/14/21. No further action is needed, but counsel is asked to be mindful of correct dates when filing future documents. (alf)
|
|
Filing 9
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leanne Crowe, Levi Crowe as to SRR Partners served on 11/22/2021 11/23/21, answer due 12/13/2021 12/14/2021. . (Anderson-West, Michele) Modified on 12/9/2021 - summons indicates that document was served on 11/23/21 not 11/22/21 - answer deadline updated (alf).
|
|
Filing 8
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leanne Crowe, Levi Crowe as to JJ's Mercantile served on 11/22/2021 11/23/21, answer due 12/13/2021 12/14/2021. (Stavros, Andrew) Modified on 12/9/2021- Summons indicated that the document was served on 11/23/21, not 11/22/21. Answer deadline updated. (alf). Modified on 12/9/2021 (alf).
|
|
Filing 7
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Elizabeth Rad. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh)
|
|
Filing 6
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to JJ's Mercantile. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nmt)
|
|
Filing 5
**RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to SRR Partners. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (nmt)
|
|
Filing 4
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/2/2021. (pjd)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/02/2021. (jl)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against JJ's Mercantile, Elizabeth Rad, SRR Partners (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4152759) filed by Leanne Crowe, Levi Crowe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Anderson-West, Michele)
|
|
Filing 1
Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiffs Leanne Crowe, Levi Crowe are directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (mh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
