Stone Well Service v. Paradox Upstream
Plaintiff: Stone Well Service
Defendant: Paradox Upstream and CCI Paradox Upstream
Case Number: 4:2021cv00125
Filed: December 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Paul Kohler
Referring Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Stone Well Service. Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Burghardt, Paul)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #16 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply.By no later than February 22, 2022, Plaintiff may file a sur-reply to Defendant's #14 Reply. The sur-reply may address only new evidence and argument raised in the #14 Reply, and may not exceed 7 pages in length. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 02/14/2022. No attached document. (apm)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Stone Well Service. Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Burghardt, Paul)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Defendant's OBJECTIONS to Motion to Amend Complaint filed by Paradox Upstream. (Stephens, Mitchell)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Litigation filed by Defendant Paradox Upstream. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit-A Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-Shull Declaration)(Stephens, Mitchell)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Litigation filed by Plaintiff Stone Well Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Burghardt, Paul)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct and Memorandum in Support Complaint filed by Plaintiff Stone Well Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Burghardt, Paul)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #8 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Litigation: Response due by 1/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 1/11/22 (alt)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Modification of Docket re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Litigation. Error: Motion requesting 2 different reliefs was filed with only one relief, "Compel", selected. Correction: Second relief, "Stay", has been added to the entry. (alt)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #8 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Stone Well Service. Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Burghardt, Paul) Modified on 1/11/2022: corrected entry text (alt)
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul P. Burghardt on behalf of Stone Well Service (Burghardt, Paul)
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Litigation and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Paradox Upstream. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Stone Well Service, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Declaration ISO Stone Well Mediation, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-Michigan Registraion, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D-Michigan Filings) Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Stephens, Mitchell). Added MOTION to Stay and corrected entry text on 1/11/2022 (alt)
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 12/27/2021. (pjd)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 12/22/21 (alt)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE FROM THE COURT This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (pjd)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant Paradox Upstream. (nmt)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Seventh District Court San Juan County, case number 210700032, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4200078) filed by Paradox Upstream. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Stephens, Mitchell)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Defendant Paradox Upstream is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (nmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stone Well Service v. Paradox Upstream
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stone Well Service
Represented By: Robert M. Henriksen
Represented By: Paul P. Burghardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paradox Upstream
Represented By: Lara A. Swensen
Represented By: Mitchell A. Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CCI Paradox Upstream
Represented By: Lara A. Swensen
Represented By: Mitchell A. Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?