Boldt v. Kassel et al
| Inge Boldt |
| Glenn Kassel and New Prime a Nebraska Limited Liability Company doing business as Prime |
| 4:2022cv00031 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Nuffer |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Inge Boldt, Defendants Glenn Kassel, New Prime. (mh) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) with Jury Demand filed by Glenn Kassel, New Prime. (mh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fifth Judicial District Washington County, State of Utah, case number 220500009, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC4337217) filed by Glenn Kassel and New Prime. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Smith, Kathryn) Modified on 5/19/2022 to include New Prime as a filer (mh). |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Defendants Glenn Kassel, New Prime are directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
