Haynes et al v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Roberta Haynes and Rick Haynes
Defendant: M.D. Rhett Roger Smith, M.D. Roger Hal Smith, Rhett Roger Smith and Roger Hal Smith
Case Number: 4:2022cv00036
Filed: June 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Paul Kohler
Referring Judge: Howard C Nielson
2 Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Filing 16 Amended ANSWER to Complaint on Behalf of Both Defendants, Joinder in Jury Demand, and Notice of Intent to Apportion Fault to Non-Parties filed by Rhett Roger Smith, Roger Hal Smith.(Owens, Stephen)
July 27, 2022 Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint on Behalf of Both Defendants, Joinder in Jury Demand, and Notice of Intent to Apportion Fault to Non-Parties filed by Rhett Roger Smith, Roger Hal Smith.(Owens, Stephen)
June 24, 2022 Filing 14 Case Reassigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Judge David Nuffer no longer assigned to the case as a result of Judge Nuffer's interim role as acting Chief Deputy Clerk. Magistrate Judge Referral is unaffected. Case number will now read 4:22-cv-0036-HCN-PK. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (jwt)
June 20, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by James T. Egan on behalf of Rhett Roger Smith, Roger Hal Smith (Egan, James)
June 20, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Nourin Nahed Abourahma on behalf of Rhett Roger Smith, Roger Hal Smith (Abourahma, Nourin)
June 20, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen W. Owens on behalf of Rhett Roger Smith, Roger Hal Smith (Owens, Stephen)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DOCKET TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Robert A. Waller, Jr for Rick Haynes, Roberta Haynes.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. So ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 6/13/22 (docket text only - no attached document) (alt)
June 10, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert A. Waller, Jr. , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4359103,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiffs Rick Haynes, Roberta Haynes. (Dahl, Mark)
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/10/2022. (pjd)
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/9/22 (alt)
June 9, 2022 Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Roger Hal Smith. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks)
June 9, 2022 Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Rhett Roger Smith. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (ks)
June 9, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Robert A Waller Jr, for Plaintiffs Rick Haynes, Roberta Haynes (ks)
June 9, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE FROM THE COURT This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (pjd)
June 8, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT And Jury Demand against Rhett Roger Smith, Roger Hal Smith (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4357398) filed by Roberta Haynes, Rick Haynes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (Dahl, Mark)
June 8, 2022 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiffs Rick Haynes, Roberta Haynes is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (ks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes et al v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roberta Haynes
Represented By: Mark W. Dahl
Represented By: Robert A. Waller, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rick Haynes
Represented By: Mark W. Dahl
Represented By: Robert A. Waller, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M.D. Rhett Roger Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M.D. Roger Hal Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rhett Roger Smith
Represented By: James T. Egan
Represented By: Stephen W. Owens
Represented By: Nourin Nahed Abourahma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Hal Smith
Represented By: James T. Egan
Represented By: Stephen W. Owens
Represented By: Nourin Nahed Abourahma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?