United States of America v. 593470 Dollars in US Currency
| United States of America |
| $593,470 Dollars in US Currency and 593470 Dollars in US Currency |
| 4:2023cv00095 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Nuffer |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 0881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ERROR AND CORRECTION re #3 Writ Issued. The document was filed using the wrong filing event - it is not a writ. The document has been re-filed correctly as #4 Warrant issued and that is the document that is active in the case. The clerk has marked entry #3 as erroneous. (alt) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT for Arrest In REM ISSUED on 10/19/23 by Alison Adams, Chief Deputy Clerk (alt) |
| Filing 3 ERROR: REFILED CORRECTLY AS #4 WARRANT - WRIT IN REM issued on 10/19/23 by Alison Adams, Chief Deputy Clerk (alt) Modified on 10/19/2023: added error text (alt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant in rem filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Elder, Travis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE against $593,470 Dollars in US Currency (Fee Status: Waived) filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (haa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
