Acuity v. Design to Print
| Acuity |
| Design to Print |
| 4:2023cv00102 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Paul Kohler |
| David Nuffer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Acuity, Counter Defendant Acuity. (jwt) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #13 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Plaintiff Acuity. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Counterclaim) Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Knight, Jeremy) |
| Filing 16 RECEIVED Magistrate Availability Form from Defendant Design to Print. (mh) |
| Filing 15 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Design to Print. (Welch, Benjamin) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Design to Print identifying No Corporate Parent as Corporate Parent. (Welch, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Acuity filed by Design to Print.(Welch, Benjamin) |
| Filing 12 CLERKS ORDER granting #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, signed by Tiffany Brown. Answer deadline updated for Design to Print - answer due 12/14/2023 (alt) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Design to Print. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Paul Kohler.(Welch, Benjamin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Aline Marie H. Longstaff on behalf of Design to Print (Longstaff, Aline Marie) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Tim Welch on behalf of Design to Print (Welch, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed for Person served on Stefanie H. Bevans on 110923, filed by Defendant Design to Print., SUMMONS Returned Executed by Acuity as to Design to Print served on 11/9/2023, answer due 11/30/2023. (Thompson, James) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/1/23 (alt)
|
|
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/1/2023. (pjd)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM THE COURT This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (pjd) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Design to Print. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (sg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Acuity. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 11/21/2023. (sg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Design to Print (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4860450) filed by Acuity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Policy, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Reservation of Rights, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Thompson, James) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Nuffer. Plaintiff Acuity is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Acuity v. Design to Print | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Acuity | |
| Represented By: | James C. Thompson |
| Represented By: | Andrew B. McDaniel |
| Represented By: | Sidney Robert Horrocks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Design to Print | |
| Represented By: | Aline Marie H. Longstaff |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Tim Welch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
