Rich v. Marsh et al
| Jordan Rich |
| Cody Marsh, Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior, The, Tracy Stone-Manning and Bureau of Land Management |
| 4:2024cv00010 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Paul Kohler |
| David Nuffer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge David Nuffer and Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Jordan Rich. (alf)
|
|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, The, Deb Haaland, Cody Marsh, Tracy Stone-Manning (Originally received by the court on 01/22/2024) filed by Jordan Rich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Maps, #2 Exhibit 2 Pictures, #3 Exhibit 3 Violation Notice) (haa)
|
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 1/24/2024. (alf)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Jordan Rich. (haa)
|
|
Filing 6
COMPLAINT against Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, The, Deb Haaland, Cody Marsh, Tracy Stone-Manning (Originally received by the court on 01/19/2024). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Jordan Rich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler (haa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 01/23/2024. (haa)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Jordan Rich. Form due by 2/12/2024. (mh)
|
|
Filing 3
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Amended Complaint. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (alf)
|
|
Filing 2
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, motion, civil cover sheet and envelope. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Motion APP Cousel, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope )(haa)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis- Motion is not complete; it has missing pages. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 01/19/2024) filed by Plaintiff Jordan Rich. (haa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
