Kinch v. Todd
| Stacy Eileen Kinch |
| Zachary Todd |
| 4:2025cv00104 |
| August 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Paul Kohler |
| David Nuffer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Supplementing #7 Order to Propose Schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 8/26/25 (alt)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 8/26/25 (alt)
|
|
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 08/25/2025. (bmr)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Location: This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the Central Division of the District of Utah. More information is on the court's #Southern Region web page. (bmr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen recused. Case reassigned to Judge David Nuffer for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen on 08/25/2025. (kpf)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed to Plaintiff Stacy Eileen Kinch. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 9/12/2025. (mdj) |
| District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen added. Case number will now read 4:25-cv-00104-AMA. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (mdj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #1 Complaint. The Civil Cover Sheet is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule DUCivR3-4. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet JS44 immediately. (mdj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Zachary Todd (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5527080) filed by Stacy Eileen Kinch. (Jackson, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kinch v. Todd | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stacy Eileen Kinch | |
| Represented By: | J. Bryan Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zachary Todd | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
