Prows v. Orem City Corporation et al
| Kenneth Ray Prows and Kenny Ray Prows |
| Orem City Corporation, Judge FNU Backlund, FNU LNU and Orem City Police Department |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 4:2026cv00079 |
| July 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Ann Marie McIff Allen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOUTHERN REGION ASSIGNMENT. This case is assigned to the Southern Region of the District of Utah. The location for court proceedings is in St. George unless the court orders otherwise. More information is on the court's #Southern Region webpage. (kop) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Ray Prows. (kop) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Case file forwarded to the Prisoner Litigation Unit. (Received by the court on: 7/13/2026) filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Ray Prows. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Backlund, FNU LNU, Orem City Corporation, Orem City Police Department (Originally received by the court on 7/13/2026). (Fee Status: pending IFP) filed by Kenneth Ray Prows. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Statement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope ) Assigned to District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen. (kop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
