Bain v. Gorczyk et al
| Stephen Bain |
| John Gorczyk, Robert Hofmann, Steven Gold, James Donnon, Keith Tallon, Michael O'Malley, Robert Arnell, David Boulanger, Raymond Flum, Kevin Oddy, Christopher Owens, Kathleen Lanman, Susan Wehry, Cody, Kurns, Rouse, Leppman, Kuttler, Prison Health Services, Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Vermont, State of, Vermont Department of Corrections, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 1:2007cv00116 |
| May 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Brattleboro Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J. Garvan Murtha |
| Jerome J. Niedermeier |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER Affirming, Approving and Adopting 123 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation re: 113 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by James Donnan, Vermont Department of Corrections, David Boulanger, Kathleen Lanman, Kevin Oddy, Raymond Flu m, John Gorczyk, Vermont, State of, Robert Hofmann, Christopher Owens, Steven Gold, Robert Arnell, Michael O'Malley, Keith Tallon amd Dr. Susan Wehry. Dfts' 113 Motion for Summary Judgment on pltf's remaining claim of retaliation is GRANTED. Case DISMISSED. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 12/30/2010. (kak)
|
|
Filing
123
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that Defendant's 113 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Retaliation Claim be granted. Because Bains claim of retaliation was the only remaining claim in the case, I further recommend that the case be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 12/20/2010. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 12/3/2010. (hbc)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER AFFIRMING, APPROVING and ADOPTING 116 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Construing Plaintiff's 114 Motion for Relief from the Court's Report and Recommendation as a motion for reconsideration of the Court's 112 Order adopting the Magistrate Judge's 111 Report and Recommendation the motion is DENED. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 09/3/2010. (wjf)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER AFFIRMING, APPROVING and ADOPTING 111 Magistrate Judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Dfts' 98 and 101 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Because Dfts' arguments at summary judgment do no address all claims set forth in 4 Complaint, any further dispositive motions shall be filed on or before 4/30/2010. It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal woudl be frivolous. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy for further proceedings. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 3/24/2010. (kak)
|
|
Filing
111
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: recommending that defendants' 98 JOINT MOTION for Summary Judgment and 101 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on ADA claim be granted. ORDERED: plaintiff's 107 MOTION for Sanctions is DENIED. Because defen dants' arguments at summary judgment do not address all claims in the complaint, it is further recommended that the Court require further dispositive motions to be filed by 4/30/2010. Objections to R&R due by 3/8/2010. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 2/19/10. (hbc)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER: Magistrate Judge's 80 Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. Defendant's 59 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 3/25/2009. (kak)
|
|
Filing
80
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment be denied. ORDERED: 58 MOTION to Stay is DENIED; 65 MOTION for Extension of the Discovery Schedule is GRANTED (parties shall submit revised stipulated discovery schedul e by 2/16/2009); 61 MOTION to Compel and for Joinder of Parties and Joinder of Claims is DENIED; 72 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery is DENIED; Defendant's 75 MOTION for Extension of Time and 79 MOTION for Leave to File a Surreply a re GRANTED; 68 and 74 MOTIONS for Extension of Time are DENIED as moot. Finally, to the extent that Bain has asked for sanctions for discovery-related violations, his motion is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2009. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 1/22/2009. (hbc) Text clarified on 1/23/2009 (jlh).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
