Haines v. Hoffman et al
| Michael Haines |
| Robert Hoffman, Jessie Cook and Jr. Davis |
| 1:2007cv00138 |
| June 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Brattleboro Office |
| Rutland |
| J. Garvan Murtha |
| Jerome J. Niedermeier |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER AFFIRMING, APPROVING, and ADOPTING 28 Magistrate Judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 27 Motion to Dismiss filed by Jessie Cook is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall provide proper response to all outstanding discovery on or before 7/28/2009. Failure to comply with this deadline will result in a severe sanction - an order dismissing the entire case with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 7/8/2009. (kak)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that 27 MOTION to Dismiss be denied without prejudice. It is further recommended that 1) plaintiff be required to provide proper responses to all outstanding discovery within 20 days of the Court's order with respect to this Report and Recommendation, 2) that the Court warns plaintiff that a failure to comply with the 20-day deadline will result in a severe sanction, most likely in the form of an order dismissing the entire case with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 6/8/2009. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 5/18/09. (hbc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
