Brown v. Catella et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Brown
Defendant: Joshua Catella, Matthew Birmingham, Trevor Carbo and John O'Connor
Case Number: 1:2008cv00201
Filed: October 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: J. Garvan Murtha
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 46 Motion to Dismiss as to their Individual Capacities; Trevor Carbo and John O'Connor. Plaintiff may amend his claims against these defendants on or before 8/16/2010. Failure to file a timely amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice. All claims against defendants Catella and Birmingham are dismissed. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 7/26/2010. (kak)
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION and ORDER: 34 Motion to dismiss filed by defendants Carbo and OConnor is GRANTED. Pltf's 35 Motion for reconsideration and 39 Motion to disqualify are DENIED. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 12/14/2009. (kak)
April 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER: granting 15 Motion to Quash by non-Deft John O'Connor; granting 17 Motion to Dismiss by Deft Catella; granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment by non-Deft John O'Connor; granting 23 Motion for Judgment on the Plead ings by Deft Birmingham ; denying 24 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 24 Motion to Continue. Pltf Brown may amend his arrest-related claims against defts Catella and Birmingham on or before 6/1/2009. Failure to file a timely amended complaint will result in the dismissal of all claims against Catella and Birmingham. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 4/17/2009. (wjf)
January 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying without prejudice 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 1/7/2009. (wjf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Catella et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Catella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Birmingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trevor Carbo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?