Hall v. Sorrell
Petitioner:
Victor G. Hall
Respondent:
William H. Sorrell
Case Number:
1:2009cv00291
Filed:
December 22, 2009
Court:
Vermont District Court
Office:
Brattleboro Office
County:
Chittenden
Referring Judge:
John M. Conroy
Presiding Judge:
J. Garvan Murtha
Nature of Suit:
Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
April 28, 2010 | 26 |
![]() |
March 26, 2010 | 23 |
![]() |
March 3, 2010 | 19 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hall v. Sorrell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Victor G. Hall | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: William H. Sorrell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.