Chandler v. Branchaud et al
Charles Chandler |
Matthew Branchaud, Abatiell Associates, P.C., Eric Louttit, Michael Kennedy and David Suntag |
1:2011cv00022 |
January 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
Brattleboro Office |
Windham |
J Garvan Murtha |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER denying #24 Motion to Disqualify Judge. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 3/21/2012. (kak) |
Filing 27 MANDATE of USCA dismissing sua sponte #23 Notice of Appeal filed by Charles Chandler (kac) Text clarified on 1/6/2012 (jlh). |
Filing 26 APPEAL RECORD Sent to USCA Circuit No. 11-3830-cv (Electronic File). Indexed record on Appeal for #23 Notice of Appeal transmitted to U.S. Court of Appeals. (gmg) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition to #24 MOTION to Disqualify Judge Murtha filed by Eric Louttit. (Harris, Michael) |
Filing 24 MOTION to Disqualify filed by Charles Chandler. (Previous entry same image).(gmg) |
Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #20 Opinion and Order by Charles Chandler. Filing fee $ 455. Paid R#00866. (Next entry same image). (gmg) |
Filing 22 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #20 Opinion and Order. The document image has been replaced to correct the case caption. The correct document is now attached to #20 as well as this entry. (jlh) |
Filing 21 JUDGMENT : Defendants' #5 , #6 , #7 and #8 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. Plaintiff's #10 Motions for Summary Judgment and for Sanctions are DENIED as moot, and this case is DISMISSED. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 09/14/2011. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Litigants - Appeal to be filed by 10/14/2011)(wjf) |
Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER: granting #5 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting #6 Motion to Dismiss; granting #7 Motion to Dismiss; granting #8 Motion to Dismiss; denying #10 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying #10 Motion for Sanctions. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 9/13/2011. (wjf) Link added on 9/14/2011 (jlh). (Main Document 20 replaced on 9/14/2011) (jlh). |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #18 Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Eric Louttit. The Criminal Docket sheet attachment was not attached at the time of docketing and has been added. The attachment is also attached to this entry. (jlh) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition to #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment and MOTION for Sanctions filed by Eric Louttit. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Disputed Material Facts, #2 Affidavit of Carling Monder, #3 Affidavit of Eric S. Louttit, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Criminal Docket)(Harris, Michael) (Additional attachment added on 4/1/2011) (jlh) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition to #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Abatiell Associates, P.C., Matthew Branchaud. (wjf) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition to #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Sanctions filed by Michael Kennedy. (Brown, Jana) |
Filing 15 REPLY to Response to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Eric Louttit. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harris, Michael) Text clarified on 3/18/2011 (jlh). |
Filing 14 RESPONSE in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Michael Kennedy. (Brown, Jana) |
Filing 13 STATEMENT OF DISPUTED FACTS by David Suntag re: #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Gagnon, William) Text clarified on 3/10/2011 (jlh). |
Filing 12 COMBINED REPLY to Response to #8 MOTION to Dismiss and RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by David Suntag. (Gagnon, William) Text clarified on 3/10/2011 (jlh). |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael J. Harris on behalf of Eric Louttit. (Harris, Michael) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Judgment and MOTION for Sanctions by Charles Chandler. (Attachments: #1 Proofs of Service, #2 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, #3 Affidavit of Charles Chandler)(Previous Entry Same Image) (kak) Text clarified on 3/1/2011 (jlh). |
Filing 9 OBJECTION to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, #7 MOTION to Dismiss, #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Charles Chandler. (Attachments: #1 Proofs of Service, #2 Statement of Undisputed Facts, #3 Affidavit of Charles Chandler)((Next Entry Same Image) (kak) Text clarified on 3/1/2011 (jlh). |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by David Suntag. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Gagnon, William) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Michael Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Michael Kennedy)(Brown, Jana) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Eric Louttit.(wjf) Text clarified on 2/14/2011 (jlh). |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Matthew Branchaud and Abatiell Associates, P.C.(kak) Filer added on 2/11/2011 (jlh). |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Dft David Suntag's answer or responsive pleading due 2/24/2011. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 2/9/2011. (This is a text only Order.) (kbl) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by David Suntag.(Gagnon, William) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William L. Gagnon on behalf of David Suntag. (Gagnon, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Abatiell Associates, P.C., Matthew Branchaud, Michael Kennedy, Eric Louttit, David Suntag filed by Charles Chandler. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(wjf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.