Papazoni v. Shumlin
Plaintiff: David Papazoni
Defendant: Peter Shumlin
Case Number: 1:2015cv00056
Filed: March 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Brattleboro Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: J. Garvan Murtha
Nature of Suit: Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and all claims are DISMISSED. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an Amended Complaint, consistent with this Opinion and Order, within 30days. Failure to file an Amended Complaint on or before by 5/22/2015 will result in dismissal of this case. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 4/22/2015. (kak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Papazoni v. Shumlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Papazoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Shumlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?