Doe v. Vermont Office of Child Support et al
Jane Doe |
Vermont Office of Child Support, Georgia Division of Child Support Services, Keith Horton, Commissioner for the State of Vermont for the Office of Child Support et al., Jane Doe and John Doe |
1:2015cv00228 |
October 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
Brattleboro Office |
Chittenden |
J. Garvan Murtha |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER Defendant's 50 Motion to Dismiss GRANTED. Plaintiff's 52 Motion to Request to Replead DENIED. Plaintiff warned that further multiplicitous and baseless litigation may result in the Court seeking to impose a filing injunction. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 6/8/2017. (kak) |
Filing 44 ORDER: 9 Special Appearance Motion to Dismiss GRANTED. All claims against the Georgia Division of Child Support Services and Commissioner Crittenden are dismissed without prejudice. 34 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction GRANTED. All c laims against the VT Office of Child Support or its Commissioner are dismissed with prejudice. Pltf's 21 Motion to Seal; 22 Motion for Joinder; 23 Motion for Judicial Notice and 24 Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery are DENIED. Pltf to provide Clerk's office with current address to serve dft Keith Horton by 7/22/2016 or claim will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 6/22/2016. (kak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.