Stearns v. Lane
Plaintiff: Lisa Stearns
Defendant: Rashied Lane
Case Number: 2:2008cv00175
Filed: February 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Burlington Office
County: Chittenden
Presiding Judge: William K. Sessions
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION-The Court holds that Rashied Lane is liable to the UnitedStates Government in the amount of $828.00 on Count I. LisaStearnss share of the proceeds is reduced to zero. No expenses,fees or costs are awarded. Counts II and III are dismissed. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 9/15/2010. Copies mailed to Non-NEF parties.(jam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stearns v. Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Stearns
Represented By: Rebecca T. Plummer, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rashied Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?