Nolen v. City of Barre, Vermont et al
| Wallace S. Nolen |
| City of Barre, Vermont, Thomas Lauzon, John Craig, Patricia McDonald, Peter John, Oliver L Twombly, Timothy Bombardier, Andrew Marceau, Paul Poirier, Randall Copping, Jon Valsangiacomo, Steven Mackenzie, Scott Gagnon, Carol Dawes, Peter O'Grady and Michael P. Smith |
| 2:2010cv00241 |
| October 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Burlington Office |
| Washington |
| William K. Sessions |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction; granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss. Nolen's claims under APRA are DISMISSED without prejudice. All official capacity claims again st Defendants Lauzon, Craig, McDonald, John, Twombly, Dawes, Bombardier, Marceau, Poirier, Copping, Valsangiacomo, Mackenzie, Gagnon, OGrady and Smith are DISMISSED without prejudice. All constitutional claims against Defendants Marceau, Poirier, Cop ping, Valsangiacomo, Mackenzie, Gagnon, OGrady and Smith in their individual capacities are also DISMISSED without prejudice. The Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to complete service upon the remaining individual capacity Defendants (Lauzon, Craig, McDonald, John, Twombly, Dawes, and Bombardier). Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 3/1/2011. (law) (Main Document 28 replaced on 3/1/2011) (law).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
