Riley v. Brook
Plaintiff: Kathleen Riley
Defendant: Jonathan Brook
Case Number: 2:2015cv00150
Filed: June 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Burlington Office
County: Windham
Presiding Judge: Christina Reiss
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part 24 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Christina Reiss on 11/24/2015. (law)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. Brook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Riley
Represented By: Sharon L. Annis, Esq.
Represented By: Bettina V. Buehler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan Brook
Represented By: Eric J. Morgan, Esq.
Represented By: Harry R. Ryan III, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?