Litowchak v. Litowchak
Petitioner: Christopher Litowchak
Respondent: Elizabeth Litowchak
Case Number: 2:2015cv00185
Filed: August 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Burlington Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Christina Reiss
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42:11603
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ENTRY ORDER granting 33 Motion to Amend 1 Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Christina Reiss on 11/20/2015. (pac)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Litowchak v. Litowchak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Litowchak
Represented By: Robert D. Arenstein, Esq.
Represented By: Gary R. von Stange, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Elizabeth Litowchak
Represented By: Tristram J. Coffin, Esq.
Represented By: Merritt S. Schnipper, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?