Sutton et al v. People's United Financial, Inc. et al
| Patrick Tawil, Antony Sutton and Glyn Moser |
| People's United Bank and People's United Financial, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv00146 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Christina Reiss |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED Executed. People's United Financial, Inc. served on 10/19/2018, answer due 11/9/2018.(law) |
| ISSUED Summons as to People's United Bank, People's United Financial, Inc. filed by Antony Sutton, Glyn Moser, Patrick Tawil.(gmg) Parties clarified on 10/18/2018 (law). |
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Admission of Keith L. Miller, Esq. Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Christina Reiss on 9/28/2018. (This is a text-only Order.) (ejh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appearance Pro Hac Vice of Keith L. Miller filed by Glyn Moser, Antony Sutton, Patrick Tawil. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(jlh) |
| Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against People's United Bank, People's United Financial, Inc. filed by Antony Sutton, Glyn Moser, Patrick Tawil. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(law) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
